<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (4) TMI 810 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165194</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court quashed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to lack of mention of notice served to the accused. The accused must be given the opportunity to pay within 15 days of notice before a case can be filed. The appeal was allowed. [2000 (4) TMI 810 - SC]</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 10:39:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=356045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (4) TMI 810 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165194</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court quashed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act due to lack of mention of notice served to the accused. The accused must be given the opportunity to pay within 15 days of notice before a case can be filed. The appeal was allowed. [2000 (4) TMI 810 - SC]</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>