https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165190 An application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for filing an arbitration agreement and seeking reference to arbitration was held not to fall within article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908, because that article had been confined to applications under the Code of Civil Procedure. Section 37(1) did not empower the court to reject the application as time-barred at the reference stage, since limitation of the underlying claim was a matter for the arbitrator after reference, not for the court while deciding whether to file the agreement and order reference. en-us Mon, 12 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Aug 2014 10:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165190 An application under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 for filing an arbitration agreement and seeking reference to arbitration was held not to fall within article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908, because that article had been confined to applications under the Code of Civil Procedure. Section 37(1) did not empower the court to reject the application as time-barred at the reference stage, since limitation of the underlying claim was a matter for the arbitrator after reference, not for the court while deciding whether to file the agreement and order reference. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 12 Sep 1966 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165190