<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 619 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247692</link>
    <description>The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted the additions made by the Assessing Officer under section 68 of the IT Act for unsecured loans received by the appellant. The department&#039;s appeal was rejected as the appellant successfully demonstrated the genuineness and creditworthiness of the parties involved through proper documentation, including confirmations, PANs, ITRs, and bank statements. The court found that the appellant had discharged the burden of proof required for such transactions, leading to the deletion of the additions based on suspicion by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 08:21:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 619 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247692</link>
      <description>The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) deleted the additions made by the Assessing Officer under section 68 of the IT Act for unsecured loans received by the appellant. The department&#039;s appeal was rejected as the appellant successfully demonstrated the genuineness and creditworthiness of the parties involved through proper documentation, including confirmations, PANs, ITRs, and bank statements. The court found that the appellant had discharged the burden of proof required for such transactions, leading to the deletion of the additions based on suspicion by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>