<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (12) TMI 25 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165186</link>
    <description>Section 29(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 was treated as applicable to an appeal under section 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, because the special appellate limitation was different from the First Schedule and the Limitation Act&#039;s computation rules therefore applied. An appeal under section 116-A was also regarded as an appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure for article 156, since the High Court exercised the same powers and procedure as in an appeal from an original decree. The time requisite for obtaining a copy of the Tribunal&#039;s order could be excluded under section 12, so the limitation objection failed and the election appeal remained maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2014 08:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (12) TMI 25 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165186</link>
      <description>Section 29(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908 was treated as applicable to an appeal under section 116-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, because the special appellate limitation was different from the First Schedule and the Limitation Act&#039;s computation rules therefore applied. An appeal under section 116-A was also regarded as an appeal under the Code of Civil Procedure for article 156, since the High Court exercised the same powers and procedure as in an appeal from an original decree. The time requisite for obtaining a copy of the Tribunal&#039;s order could be excluded under section 12, so the limitation objection failed and the election appeal remained maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>