https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247688 The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal due to a significant delay of 580 days attributed to the appellant's advocate's inaction. Despite the appellant's explanation of forwarding necessary documents to the advocate, the Tribunal found the appellant failed to take proactive steps in responding to reminders from the Department. Consequently, the appeal, along with the stay petition, was dismissed for lacking merit. The judgment was pronounced on 23rd April 2014 by M V Ravindran and H K Thakur, JJ. en-us Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 May 2014 15:38:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247688 The Tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal due to a significant delay of 580 days attributed to the appellant's advocate's inaction. Despite the appellant's explanation of forwarding necessary documents to the advocate, the Tribunal found the appellant failed to take proactive steps in responding to reminders from the Department. Consequently, the appeal, along with the stay petition, was dismissed for lacking merit. The judgment was pronounced on 23rd April 2014 by M V Ravindran and H K Thakur, JJ. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247688