<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 608 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247681</link>
    <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order regarding the assessment but agreed with the decision on the levy of penalty. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with evidence and the burden of proof on the assessee in establishing transactions for tax exemptions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2014 15:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355946" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 608 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247681</link>
      <description>The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order regarding the assessment but agreed with the decision on the levy of penalty. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiating claims with evidence and the burden of proof on the assessee in establishing transactions for tax exemptions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247681</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>