https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247678 The court dismissed the petition for condonation of delay due to unsatisfactory explanations for the 1590-day delay. It also upheld the CESTAT's decision to set aside the penalties imposed under Section 11AC and Rule 173Q, as there was no evidence of suppression, wilful misappropriation, or fraud. Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was rejected at the SR stage itself. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 May 2014 15:01:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247678 The court dismissed the petition for condonation of delay due to unsatisfactory explanations for the 1590-day delay. It also upheld the CESTAT's decision to set aside the penalties imposed under Section 11AC and Rule 173Q, as there was no evidence of suppression, wilful misappropriation, or fraud. Consequently, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal was rejected at the SR stage itself. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247678