https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247678 Delay in filing the appeal was refused to be condoned because the Revenue did not offer a satisfactory, specific explanation for the 1590-day delay. The explanations that the Tribunal order was not received, the appeal papers were returned, there was non-representation, and the papers were lost or misplaced were treated as vague and unsupported by concrete dates or particulars. The Court reiterated that the law of limitation binds the Government as well, and that a liberal approach is not justified where no plausible and acceptable cause is shown. The petition was dismissed. en-us Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 19 May 2014 15:01:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247678 Delay in filing the appeal was refused to be condoned because the Revenue did not offer a satisfactory, specific explanation for the 1590-day delay. The explanations that the Tribunal order was not received, the appeal papers were returned, there was non-representation, and the papers were lost or misplaced were treated as vague and unsupported by concrete dates or particulars. The Court reiterated that the law of limitation binds the Government as well, and that a liberal approach is not justified where no plausible and acceptable cause is shown. The petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 05 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247678