https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247672 The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD. The revenue's justification for the delay was deemed insufficient, as they failed to provide valid reasons for condoning the six-year delay in filing separate appeals against respondents. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of demonstrating sufficient cause for condonation of delay, citing relevant legal precedents. Ultimately, the lack of a compelling case for condonation of delay led to the dismissal of the applications and subsequent dismissal of the appeals. en-us Thu, 01 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Jan 2015 13:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247672 The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's applications for condonation of delay in filing appeals before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD. The revenue's justification for the delay was deemed insufficient, as they failed to provide valid reasons for condoning the six-year delay in filing separate appeals against respondents. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of demonstrating sufficient cause for condonation of delay, citing relevant legal precedents. Ultimately, the lack of a compelling case for condonation of delay led to the dismissal of the applications and subsequent dismissal of the appeals. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 01 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247672