https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165185 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of clause (iii) of sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Jammu & Kashmir Houses and Shops Rent Control Act, 1966, dismissing the appeal and affirming the High Court's decision. The Court found the classification based on income to be reasonable, having a rational relation to the legislative objective of protecting economically weaker tenants while promoting construction activity. The provision was deemed not discriminatory or arbitrary, as it aimed to balance the interests of tenants and landlords, ultimately upholding the constitutionality of the clause in question. en-us Tue, 09 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Jul 2014 08:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165185 The Supreme Court upheld the validity of clause (iii) of sub-section (3) of Section 1 of the Jammu & Kashmir Houses and Shops Rent Control Act, 1966, dismissing the appeal and affirming the High Court's decision. The Court found the classification based on income to be reasonable, having a rational relation to the legislative objective of protecting economically weaker tenants while promoting construction activity. The provision was deemed not discriminatory or arbitrary, as it aimed to balance the interests of tenants and landlords, ultimately upholding the constitutionality of the clause in question. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Oct 1990 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165185