https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165184 The Supreme Court upheld the Controller and Appellate Authority's decision in favor of the landlord in an eviction suit under Section 13(2)(v) of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent) & Eviction Act, 1973. The Court found the tenant had not occupied the premises for four months without reasonable cause, as evidenced by testimonies from the meter reader, postman, and process server. The High Court's misinterpretations led to the dismissal of the eviction application, which was overturned by the Supreme Court, granting possession to the landlord. en-us Wed, 24 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165184 The Supreme Court upheld the Controller and Appellate Authority's decision in favor of the landlord in an eviction suit under Section 13(2)(v) of the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent) & Eviction Act, 1973. The Court found the tenant had not occupied the premises for four months without reasonable cause, as evidenced by testimonies from the meter reader, postman, and process server. The High Court's misinterpretations led to the dismissal of the eviction application, which was overturned by the Supreme Court, granting possession to the landlord. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165184