https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165184 Cessation of occupation for the statutory period was held to attract eviction where the landlord proved prima facie that the tenant had not actually occupied the shop and had offered no reasonable cause. Actual occupation was treated as more than juridical possession, requiring real presence and user consistent with the tenancy. Once evidence of closure, lack of electricity use, failed service, and supporting photographs and testimony was shown, the burden shifted to the tenant to rebut the case. The Supreme Court also held that the High Court, in revision, could not reappreciate evidence or disturb concurrent factual findings on a misreading of the record, and the eviction order was restored. en-us Wed, 24 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165184 Cessation of occupation for the statutory period was held to attract eviction where the landlord proved prima facie that the tenant had not actually occupied the shop and had offered no reasonable cause. Actual occupation was treated as more than juridical possession, requiring real presence and user consistent with the tenancy. Once evidence of closure, lack of electricity use, failed service, and supporting photographs and testimony was shown, the burden shifted to the tenant to rebut the case. The Supreme Court also held that the High Court, in revision, could not reappreciate evidence or disturb concurrent factual findings on a misreading of the record, and the eviction order was restored. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165184