https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165183 The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the eviction decree against the tenant. The courts upheld the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, confirmed the jurisdictional fact of the tenant's paid-up share capital, allowed the eviction proceedings despite the tenant's status as a sick company, and rejected the consideration of subsequent events and equitable relief due to the tenant's conduct. en-us Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 07 May 2019 18:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165183 The appeal was dismissed with costs, affirming the eviction decree against the tenant. The courts upheld the constitutional validity of Section 3(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, confirmed the jurisdictional fact of the tenant's paid-up share capital, allowed the eviction proceedings despite the tenant's status as a sick company, and rejected the consideration of subsequent events and equitable relief due to the tenant's conduct. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165183