https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165181 The court dismissed the appeals, upholding the orders of eviction due to the appellant's continuous non-occupation of the premises without reasonable cause. The appellant failed to prove occupation through lack of business activity and relevant documentation. Financial constraints from proceedings under the 1985 Act were not accepted as a reasonable cause for non-occupation. The appellant was granted three months to vacate the premises upon filing an undertaking, with restrictions on transferring possession during this period. en-us Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 02 Jun 2014 11:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165181 The court dismissed the appeals, upholding the orders of eviction due to the appellant's continuous non-occupation of the premises without reasonable cause. The appellant failed to prove occupation through lack of business activity and relevant documentation. Financial constraints from proceedings under the 1985 Act were not accepted as a reasonable cause for non-occupation. The appellant was granted three months to vacate the premises upon filing an undertaking, with restrictions on transferring possession during this period. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165181