<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 595 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247668</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee on both substantial questions of law. The judgment emphasized the allowability of the expenditure under the unapproved gratuity scheme and the lack of valid grounds for re-opening the assessment, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 08:16:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 595 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247668</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the department&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the assessee on both substantial questions of law. The judgment emphasized the allowability of the expenditure under the unapproved gratuity scheme and the lack of valid grounds for re-opening the assessment, ultimately ruling in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>