https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247658 The court held that the Ruler is only exempt from tax on the annual value of the palace parts in his actual occupation. The earlier Division Bench judgment in Maharawal Laxman Singh Vs. C.I.T. was upheld, overruling the later judgment in C.I.T. Vs. H.H. Maharao Bhim Singhji. The case was referred back for further proceedings. en-us Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Aug 2014 18:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247658 The court held that the Ruler is only exempt from tax on the annual value of the palace parts in his actual occupation. The earlier Division Bench judgment in Maharawal Laxman Singh Vs. C.I.T. was upheld, overruling the later judgment in C.I.T. Vs. H.H. Maharao Bhim Singhji. The case was referred back for further proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 26 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247658