<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 584 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247657</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the VSAT and Lease Line charges were reimbursement amounts, not subject to TDS deduction, and the penalty paid to the Stock Exchange was a legitimate business expenditure, making it deductible. The Court held that the charges were not paid in consideration of technical services, as per the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 08:15:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355910" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 584 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247657</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal, ruling that the VSAT and Lease Line charges were reimbursement amounts, not subject to TDS deduction, and the penalty paid to the Stock Exchange was a legitimate business expenditure, making it deductible. The Court held that the charges were not paid in consideration of technical services, as per the relevant provisions of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247657</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>