<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 578 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247651</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision. The appellant was directed to produce all relevant documents related to the excess payment to ensure compliance with Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed to provide the appellant with an opportunity for a personal hearing during the denovo proceeding.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2014 13:53:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355891" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 578 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247651</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision. The appellant was directed to produce all relevant documents related to the excess payment to ensure compliance with Rule 6(3) of the Service Tax Rules, 1994. The Adjudicating Authority was instructed to provide the appellant with an opportunity for a personal hearing during the denovo proceeding.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247651</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>