<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 559 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247632</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demands for customs duty on imported goods cleared under advance licences obtained through forged documents, dismissing the appeals and confirming the liability of importers based on legal precedents and the principle that forgery cannot be validated by law. The appellants&#039; argument that they were not party to the forgery was rejected, emphasizing the importance of legal validity in such cases. The Tribunal distinguished previous decisions and ruled in favor of the revenue authority, citing established case law to support its decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2015 18:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 559 - CESTAT  MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247632</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demands for customs duty on imported goods cleared under advance licences obtained through forged documents, dismissing the appeals and confirming the liability of importers based on legal precedents and the principle that forgery cannot be validated by law. The appellants&#039; argument that they were not party to the forgery was rejected, emphasizing the importance of legal validity in such cases. The Tribunal distinguished previous decisions and ruled in favor of the revenue authority, citing established case law to support its decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>