<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 558 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247631</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting input service credit to the appellants from CHA based on legal interpretation and precedents. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the significance of legal definitions and specific circumstances in determining eligibility for input service credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2014 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 558 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247631</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, granting input service credit to the appellants from CHA based on legal interpretation and precedents. The Tribunal set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the significance of legal definitions and specific circumstances in determining eligibility for input service credit under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>