<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 546 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247619</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the levy of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2006-07, finding that the assessee had concealed income revealed during a search operation. The surrender of income was deemed involuntary due to incriminating evidence found, and the application of Explanation 5A to Section 271(1)(c) was justified for undeclared income. The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s claim that diary entries were not indicative of income, dismissing the appeals and affirming the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 May 2014 09:11:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355833" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 546 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247619</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the levy of penalties under Section 271(1)(c) for the Assessment Years 2003-04 to 2006-07, finding that the assessee had concealed income revealed during a search operation. The surrender of income was deemed involuntary due to incriminating evidence found, and the application of Explanation 5A to Section 271(1)(c) was justified for undeclared income. The Tribunal rejected the assessee&#039;s claim that diary entries were not indicative of income, dismissing the appeals and affirming the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247619</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>