<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 545 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247618</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that additions made by the Assessing Officer under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act were unsustainable without incriminating material found during the search. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals as academic. The decision underscored the requirement of incriminating material for such additions, in line with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355832" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 545 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247618</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that additions made by the Assessing Officer under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act were unsustainable without incriminating material found during the search. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s cross objections, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeals as academic. The decision underscored the requirement of incriminating material for such additions, in line with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247618</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>