<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>No need to prove imported materials were used in export products under DFIA, unless on the sensitive list.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18591</link>
    <description>When the import is against the transferred DFIA (Licence) it is not necessary to establish that the material imported was actually used in the export product unless the resultant product figures in the sensitive list and the theory of broad nexus being settled by Apex Court - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 19:58:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 19:58:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>No need to prove imported materials were used in export products under DFIA, unless on the sensitive list.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18591</link>
      <description>When the import is against the transferred DFIA (Licence) it is not necessary to establish that the material imported was actually used in the export product unless the resultant product figures in the sensitive list and the theory of broad nexus being settled by Apex Court - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 19:58:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=18591</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>