<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 539 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247612</link>
    <description>Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994 permits a service tax appeal only after the Committee of Commissioners objects to the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; order and the matter is then considered by the Chief Commissioner. The scheme does not confer any implied power on the Committee to reopen or review a concluded decision not to object, and such review cannot be inferred merely because the statute is silent. Once the Committee accepts the order, that decision attains finality; a second review cannot be used to create jurisdiction for an appeal. An appeal founded on such an unauthorised second review is therefore incompetent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355815" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 539 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247612</link>
      <description>Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994 permits a service tax appeal only after the Committee of Commissioners objects to the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; order and the matter is then considered by the Chief Commissioner. The scheme does not confer any implied power on the Committee to reopen or review a concluded decision not to object, and such review cannot be inferred merely because the statute is silent. Once the Committee accepts the order, that decision attains finality; a second review cannot be used to create jurisdiction for an appeal. An appeal founded on such an unauthorised second review is therefore incompetent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>