<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 534 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247607</link>
    <description>The corporate veil may be disregarded where a company is used as a device to evade statutory dues or defeat public revenue, and personal liability can then be fastened on those controlling the company. On the facts, the court found false declarations, non-participation in assessment, and a corporate structure used to shield evasion of trade tax and allied liabilities; the directors&#039; pleas based on resignation, part-time status, and partial relief in appeal did not displace the recovery findings. The personal recovery certificates were therefore sustained and interference in writ jurisdiction was refused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 15:45:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355809" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 534 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247607</link>
      <description>The corporate veil may be disregarded where a company is used as a device to evade statutory dues or defeat public revenue, and personal liability can then be fastened on those controlling the company. On the facts, the court found false declarations, non-participation in assessment, and a corporate structure used to shield evasion of trade tax and allied liabilities; the directors&#039; pleas based on resignation, part-time status, and partial relief in appeal did not displace the recovery findings. The personal recovery certificates were therefore sustained and interference in writ jurisdiction was refused.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>