<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 533 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247606</link>
    <description>Seized slips, book marked &#039;A&#039;, stock variation and a recorded statement did not establish sales suppression where the surrounding records consistently supported the assessee&#039;s job-work activity. Order forms, delivery bills, receipt vouchers, issue vouchers and labour bills, together with the reconciliation of the seized entries, showed that the names noted related to main workers and sub-artisans. The Revenue produced no material proving actual sales, purchase of jewellery or receipt of sale consideration, and the stock difference was explained as sample jewellery entrusted for manufacture. On this evidence-based appreciation, the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the assessed turnover and refusal of remand were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 533 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247606</link>
      <description>Seized slips, book marked &#039;A&#039;, stock variation and a recorded statement did not establish sales suppression where the surrounding records consistently supported the assessee&#039;s job-work activity. Order forms, delivery bills, receipt vouchers, issue vouchers and labour bills, together with the reconciliation of the seized entries, showed that the names noted related to main workers and sub-artisans. The Revenue produced no material proving actual sales, purchase of jewellery or receipt of sale consideration, and the stock difference was explained as sample jewellery entrusted for manufacture. On this evidence-based appreciation, the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the assessed turnover and refusal of remand were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247606</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>