https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247604 The High Court upheld the tribunal's decision directing the appellant to deposit Rs.3 crores, finding no substantial question of law raised in the appeal. The court noted the seriousness of fraud allegations and granted an extension of time for compliance. The tribunal's order was seen as a measure to protect both parties' interests pending further investigation, with the appellant given the opportunity to comply and have the appeal heard on merits. Non-compliance would lead to dismissal but allow for revival upon subsequent compliance within the specified timeframe. en-us Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Nov 2014 10:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247604 The High Court upheld the tribunal's decision directing the appellant to deposit Rs.3 crores, finding no substantial question of law raised in the appeal. The court noted the seriousness of fraud allegations and granted an extension of time for compliance. The tribunal's order was seen as a measure to protect both parties' interests pending further investigation, with the appellant given the opportunity to comply and have the appeal heard on merits. Non-compliance would lead to dismissal but allow for revival upon subsequent compliance within the specified timeframe. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247604