<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 526 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247599</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the confirmation of antidumping duty demand in a case where the Tribunal had confirmed the demand. The Court found no legal flaw in the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal as it did not raise any substantial question of law. The Court emphasized the importance of considering all materials and findings in such cases and highlighted discrepancies in the origin certificates and statements relied upon by the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 13:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 526 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247599</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay upheld the confirmation of antidumping duty demand in a case where the Tribunal had confirmed the demand. The Court found no legal flaw in the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal as it did not raise any substantial question of law. The Court emphasized the importance of considering all materials and findings in such cases and highlighted discrepancies in the origin certificates and statements relied upon by the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>