<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 522 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247595</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, reducing the disallowance of estimated expenditure to 12.5 lakhs. The appellant&#039;s claim was upheld in part, restricting the disallowance to 12.5 lakhs due to the lack of proper proof for expenses claimed. The Tribunal emphasized the application of the project completion method in accounting and directed the AO to reexamine the matter to ensure all expenses are accounted for upon project completion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 13:37:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 522 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247595</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, reducing the disallowance of estimated expenditure to 12.5 lakhs. The appellant&#039;s claim was upheld in part, restricting the disallowance to 12.5 lakhs due to the lack of proper proof for expenses claimed. The Tribunal emphasized the application of the project completion method in accounting and directed the AO to reexamine the matter to ensure all expenses are accounted for upon project completion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>