<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (1) TMI 1270 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165173</link>
    <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing a fresh assessment on the issue of payments to non-resident shipping companies in compliance with Rule 46A. The ITAT upheld the deletion of additions related to excess agency commission and labor charges but overturned the deletion of addition for rent, rates, and taxes, requiring further evidence to prove business use of the properties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 10:28:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355781" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (1) TMI 1270 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165173</link>
      <description>The ITAT partially allowed the appeal, directing a fresh assessment on the issue of payments to non-resident shipping companies in compliance with Rule 46A. The ITAT upheld the deletion of additions related to excess agency commission and labor charges but overturned the deletion of addition for rent, rates, and taxes, requiring further evidence to prove business use of the properties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>