<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 511 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247584</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the petitioner had made full disclosure during the survey and subsequent assessment proceedings, providing detailed explanations and reconciliations. It was determined that the Assessing Officer should have addressed any valuation concerns during the assessment instead of issuing a reopening notice based on alleged failure to disclose material facts. Consequently, the petition was allowed, the notice was quashed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355780" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 511 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247584</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the petitioner had made full disclosure during the survey and subsequent assessment proceedings, providing detailed explanations and reconciliations. It was determined that the Assessing Officer should have addressed any valuation concerns during the assessment instead of issuing a reopening notice based on alleged failure to disclose material facts. Consequently, the petition was allowed, the notice was quashed, and no costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247584</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>