<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 500 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247573</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI partially allowed the appeal concerning the taxability of services provided by the appellant in recruiting temporary contract labor for the Rajasthan Public Service Commission. The tribunal ruled that service tax was not payable for services rendered before 16-6-2005 as they were not related to recruiting personnel for the Commission. Additionally, the appellant, being an individual, was not liable for tax on services rendered before 1-5-2006, as individuals were not considered &#039;commercial concerns.&#039; The appellant was granted a penalty waiver, only required to pay 25% of the tax due under Section 78.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 12:18:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355740" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 500 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247573</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI partially allowed the appeal concerning the taxability of services provided by the appellant in recruiting temporary contract labor for the Rajasthan Public Service Commission. The tribunal ruled that service tax was not payable for services rendered before 16-6-2005 as they were not related to recruiting personnel for the Commission. Additionally, the appellant, being an individual, was not liable for tax on services rendered before 1-5-2006, as individuals were not considered &#039;commercial concerns.&#039; The appellant was granted a penalty waiver, only required to pay 25% of the tax due under Section 78.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>