<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 492 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247565</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to use the CENVAT credit account for duty payment during the suspended period. The decision aligned with the precedent set by Noble Drugs Ltd., exempting the appellant from facing interest and penalties. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant and deeming the show-cause notice unnecessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 11:53:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355732" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 492 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247565</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing them to use the CENVAT credit account for duty payment during the suspended period. The decision aligned with the precedent set by Noble Drugs Ltd., exempting the appellant from facing interest and penalties. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant and deeming the show-cause notice unnecessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>