https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247564 The appeal challenged duty demand, penalty imposition, and exemption conditions under Notification no. 5/06 regarding indelible marking on footwear. The appellant claimed the marking was indelible, supported by certificates from IIP and NTH. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to reconsider based on the certificates, directing a fair review and independent testing option. The appeal was allowed by remand, emphasizing the importance of presenting all evidence for a fair determination. No pre-deposit was ordered, and the stay petition was disposed of accordingly. en-us Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Nov 2014 10:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247564 The appeal challenged duty demand, penalty imposition, and exemption conditions under Notification no. 5/06 regarding indelible marking on footwear. The appellant claimed the marking was indelible, supported by certificates from IIP and NTH. The Tribunal remanded the matter to the adjudicating authority to reconsider based on the certificates, directing a fair review and independent testing option. The appeal was allowed by remand, emphasizing the importance of presenting all evidence for a fair determination. No pre-deposit was ordered, and the stay petition was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 04 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247564