<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 488 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247561</link>
    <description>Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure bars review, recall or alteration only after a criminal judgment has been pronounced and signed. A dictated order that has not yet been signed does not attain finality, so it may be recalled before it becomes operative. The High Court was therefore competent to recall the unsigned order and direct rehearing, and the objection based on Section 362 failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 488 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247561</link>
      <description>Section 362 of the Code of Criminal Procedure bars review, recall or alteration only after a criminal judgment has been pronounced and signed. A dictated order that has not yet been signed does not attain finality, so it may be recalled before it becomes operative. The High Court was therefore competent to recall the unsigned order and direct rehearing, and the objection based on Section 362 failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>