https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247559 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that they are entitled to the value of goods assessed at the time of seizure, Rs. 7,75,792, rather than the amount received from the sale, Rs. 2,28,010. The court found the sale of seized goods before the expiration of the statutory appeal period unjustifiable and in violation of statutory provisions. The authorities were directed to compensate the petitioner for the unauthorized auction of confiscated goods, paying the differential amount with interest. The writ petition was disposed of with the mentioned directives, and no costs were awarded. en-us Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Sep 2014 17:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247559 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that they are entitled to the value of goods assessed at the time of seizure, Rs. 7,75,792, rather than the amount received from the sale, Rs. 2,28,010. The court found the sale of seized goods before the expiration of the statutory appeal period unjustifiable and in violation of statutory provisions. The authorities were directed to compensate the petitioner for the unauthorized auction of confiscated goods, paying the differential amount with interest. The writ petition was disposed of with the mentioned directives, and no costs were awarded. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247559