<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 484 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247557</link>
    <description>The Punjab and Haryana HC noted that the writ petition had become infructuous after the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence desealed the premises and handed them over to the petitioner, so the petition was disposed of on that basis. Although no substantive relief survived, the court expressed over the lack of concrete investigative progress in the ongoing NDPS investigation under Section 53 and directed the DRI to conclude the investigation expeditiously and proceed in accordance with law. It further required that any continued delay be placed before the head of the Directorate for consideration of appropriate disciplinary or administrative action against the officers responsible.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 11:10:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355721" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 484 - Punjab and Haryana High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247557</link>
      <description>The Punjab and Haryana HC noted that the writ petition had become infructuous after the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence desealed the premises and handed them over to the petitioner, so the petition was disposed of on that basis. Although no substantive relief survived, the court expressed over the lack of concrete investigative progress in the ongoing NDPS investigation under Section 53 and directed the DRI to conclude the investigation expeditiously and proceed in accordance with law. It further required that any continued delay be placed before the head of the Directorate for consideration of appropriate disciplinary or administrative action against the officers responsible.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Oct 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247557</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>