<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 465 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247538</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with consequential relief granted. The judgment clarified that if no evidence is presented that reduced service tax has been paid by the appellant to the service provider, credit of the full service tax shown to have been paid on the duty paying document will be admissible to the appellant. The court emphasized the importance of complying with payment requirements and the relevance of Circulars in determining the admissibility of cenvat credit in cases of discounted payments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 465 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247538</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, with consequential relief granted. The judgment clarified that if no evidence is presented that reduced service tax has been paid by the appellant to the service provider, credit of the full service tax shown to have been paid on the duty paying document will be admissible to the appellant. The court emphasized the importance of complying with payment requirements and the relevance of Circulars in determining the admissibility of cenvat credit in cases of discounted payments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247538</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>