<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 454 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247527</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision to set aside the adjudication order. The show-cause notice was deemed time-barred as the department was aware of the credit transfer before issuing the notice. The transfer of unutilized credit from one unit to another was considered valid even without existing inventory in the transferring unit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 454 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247527</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the decision to set aside the adjudication order. The show-cause notice was deemed time-barred as the department was aware of the credit transfer before issuing the notice. The transfer of unutilized credit from one unit to another was considered valid even without existing inventory in the transferring unit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>