<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 449 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247522</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the ITAT erred in rejecting the claim for Securities Transaction Tax (STT) credit. The court emphasized the broader interpretation of &quot;mistake&quot; under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, allowing relief despite technical errors. The appeal was allowed without costs, underscoring the importance of considering the wider scope of rectification purposes under Section 154.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 15:21:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 449 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247522</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the ITAT erred in rejecting the claim for Securities Transaction Tax (STT) credit. The court emphasized the broader interpretation of &quot;mistake&quot; under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, allowing relief despite technical errors. The appeal was allowed without costs, underscoring the importance of considering the wider scope of rectification purposes under Section 154.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247522</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>