<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 445 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247518</link>
    <description>The Court held that duty calculation should align with the tariff value fixed by the Central Govt. rather than transaction value. The rejection of the refund claim was overturned, emphasizing eligibility for refund if Section 27 conditions regarding unjust enrichment are met. The matter was remanded for further examination of unjust enrichment to ensure statutory conditions for refund eligibility are fulfilled under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 15:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 445 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247518</link>
      <description>The Court held that duty calculation should align with the tariff value fixed by the Central Govt. rather than transaction value. The rejection of the refund claim was overturned, emphasizing eligibility for refund if Section 27 conditions regarding unjust enrichment are met. The matter was remanded for further examination of unjust enrichment to ensure statutory conditions for refund eligibility are fulfilled under the Customs Act, 1962.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>