<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 442 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247515</link>
    <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal, remitting the case to the Assessing Officer for a detailed examination. The Court emphasized the need for the AO to investigate the nature of the amounts received and how they were expended, beyond the specific questions raised by the Tribunal. If the amount is considered income, the appellant should receive consequential benefits for subsequent years. All pending applications were disposed of in accordance with the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355642" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 442 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247515</link>
      <description>The High Court partially allowed the appeal, remitting the case to the Assessing Officer for a detailed examination. The Court emphasized the need for the AO to investigate the nature of the amounts received and how they were expended, beyond the specific questions raised by the Tribunal. If the amount is considered income, the appellant should receive consequential benefits for subsequent years. All pending applications were disposed of in accordance with the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>