<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (3) TMI 84 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165163</link>
    <description>Later legislation on medicinal and toilet preparations occupied the field and displaced earlier State provisions, so a levy linked to supervisory charges under rule 36 of the 1345-F Rules could not continue after the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 and the 1956 Rules came into force. The Act and rules formed a complete code, section 21 and rule 143 repealed corresponding State law, and pre-Constitution levies could survive only until Parliament made contrary provision under Article 277. Because rule 36 concerned supervision of manufacture within that same regime, no separate basis remained for its continued operation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2014 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355637" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (3) TMI 84 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165163</link>
      <description>Later legislation on medicinal and toilet preparations occupied the field and displaced earlier State provisions, so a levy linked to supervisory charges under rule 36 of the 1345-F Rules could not continue after the Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955 and the 1956 Rules came into force. The Act and rules formed a complete code, section 21 and rule 143 repealed corresponding State law, and pre-Constitution levies could survive only until Parliament made contrary provision under Article 277. Because rule 36 concerned supervision of manufacture within that same regime, no separate basis remained for its continued operation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>