<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1979 (4) TMI 156 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165160</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Ordinance imposing a special duty on the import of country liquor in Delhi. It found that Parliament had the competence to enact the legislation, dismissing claims of colorable legislation and affirming that the duty did not infringe on inter-State trade or the fundamental right to trade in liquor. The court deemed the retrospective application of the Ordinance permissible, emphasizing its alignment with public health and morals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2014 09:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1979 (4) TMI 156 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165160</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Ordinance imposing a special duty on the import of country liquor in Delhi. It found that Parliament had the competence to enact the legislation, dismissing claims of colorable legislation and affirming that the duty did not infringe on inter-State trade or the fundamental right to trade in liquor. The court deemed the retrospective application of the Ordinance permissible, emphasizing its alignment with public health and morals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 1979 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165160</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>