<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1975 (12) TMI 160 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165159</link>
    <description>Licences for outstill shops under the excise law were treated as grants of an exclusive privilege to manufacture and retail country liquor within the notified area, not as ordinary retail-sale licences; the auction price was therefore recoverable as consideration for that privilege. No refund, remission, or compensation was payable because the licences had not been cancelled or withdrawn in a way that triggered any statutory entitlement, and the difficulty of establishing a shop did not relieve liability. Departmental instructions on speculative bids did not create an enforceable right to reduction of licence fees, as any reduction remained discretionary under the statute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2014 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1975 (12) TMI 160 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165159</link>
      <description>Licences for outstill shops under the excise law were treated as grants of an exclusive privilege to manufacture and retail country liquor within the notified area, not as ordinary retail-sale licences; the auction price was therefore recoverable as consideration for that privilege. No refund, remission, or compensation was payable because the licences had not been cancelled or withdrawn in a way that triggered any statutory entitlement, and the difficulty of establishing a shop did not relieve liability. Departmental instructions on speculative bids did not create an enforceable right to reduction of licence fees, as any reduction remained discretionary under the statute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165159</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>