<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247505</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the short-term capital gain from the sale of shares was genuine and not income from undisclosed sources. The addition of unexplained expenditure under Section 69C was dismissed. The judgment highlighted the importance of conducting a specific inquiry and requiring evidence before making adverse inferences against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 08:34:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355610" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 432 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247505</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that the short-term capital gain from the sale of shares was genuine and not income from undisclosed sources. The addition of unexplained expenditure under Section 69C was dismissed. The judgment highlighted the importance of conducting a specific inquiry and requiring evidence before making adverse inferences against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>