<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 431 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247504</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision annulling the reassessment and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The tribunal found the reopening of assessment as bad in law, emphasizing that deemed dividend could only be assessed in the hands of the shareholder. As the assessment was invalid, there was no need to consider the appeal on merits. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling. The judgment was delivered on April 30, 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355609" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 431 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247504</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision annulling the reassessment and rejecting the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The tribunal found the reopening of assessment as bad in law, emphasizing that deemed dividend could only be assessed in the hands of the shareholder. As the assessment was invalid, there was no need to consider the appeal on merits. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s ruling. The judgment was delivered on April 30, 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247504</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>