<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 427 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247500</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions lacked incriminating material, rendering them impermissible under Section 153C. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s admission of additional evidence and rejected the Assessing Officer&#039;s income estimation. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections were allowed. The decision was pronounced on 30-4-2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 May 2014 08:29:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 427 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247500</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer&#039;s additions lacked incriminating material, rendering them impermissible under Section 153C. The Tribunal affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s admission of additional evidence and rejected the Assessing Officer&#039;s income estimation. Consequently, the revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, and the assessee&#039;s cross-objections were allowed. The decision was pronounced on 30-4-2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247500</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>