<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1951 (5) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165153</link>
    <description>The Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 was treated as valid legislation within the provincial entry on intoxicating liquors under the pith and substance doctrine, despite incidental impact on import and export across customs frontiers. The definition of liquor was upheld, but restrictions could not extend to legitimate medicinal and toilet preparations containing alcohol, as that would impose unreasonable limits on property rights. Provisions prohibiting commendation of intoxicants and incitement to evade the Act were held invalid for infringing freedom of speech and for vagueness. Exemptions for the armed forces and cargo boats, delegated permit powers, and related notifications were upheld, and the invalid portions were severable from the remainder of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2014 09:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355584" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1951 (5) TMI 3 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165153</link>
      <description>The Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 was treated as valid legislation within the provincial entry on intoxicating liquors under the pith and substance doctrine, despite incidental impact on import and export across customs frontiers. The definition of liquor was upheld, but restrictions could not extend to legitimate medicinal and toilet preparations containing alcohol, as that would impose unreasonable limits on property rights. Provisions prohibiting commendation of intoxicants and incitement to evade the Act were held invalid for infringing freedom of speech and for vagueness. Exemptions for the armed forces and cargo boats, delegated permit powers, and related notifications were upheld, and the invalid portions were severable from the remainder of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 May 1951 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165153</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>