<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 408 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247481</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s request for a complete waiver of confirmed duty amounts but allowed a partial waiver upon depositing Rs. 32 lakhs. An additional Rs. 3.5 Crores was directed to be deposited within twelve weeks. The remaining amounts were stayed pending appeal disposal, highlighting the importance of thoroughly examining conflicting evidence before making a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 11:35:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 408 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247481</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the appellant&#039;s request for a complete waiver of confirmed duty amounts but allowed a partial waiver upon depositing Rs. 32 lakhs. An additional Rs. 3.5 Crores was directed to be deposited within twelve weeks. The remaining amounts were stayed pending appeal disposal, highlighting the importance of thoroughly examining conflicting evidence before making a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247481</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>