<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (5) TMI 399 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247472</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the decisions of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the investment advisory fees and the categorization of certain items for depreciation purposes. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decisions were not legally flawed and aligned with previous rulings for the same assessee. As no substantial questions of law were raised, the appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 May 2014 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=355531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (5) TMI 399 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247472</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the decisions of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the investment advisory fees and the categorization of certain items for depreciation purposes. The Court found that the Tribunal&#039;s decisions were not legally flawed and aligned with previous rulings for the same assessee. As no substantial questions of law were raised, the appeal was dismissed in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=247472</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>