https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165147 Territorial jurisdiction to file an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940 depends on the competent statutory forum and the subject-matter of the reference; the Faridabad court was held to have jurisdiction because the parties had chosen Faridabad as the seat and forum, and the property location and Delhi proceedings did not displace that choice on the facts. An ex parte award made after the stipulated time was not treated as automatically void, because the court could consider extension of time and related reliefs. The ex parte order making the award rule of the court was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for decision on merits. en-us Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 09 Jun 2014 10:49:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165147 Territorial jurisdiction to file an arbitral award under the Arbitration Act, 1940 depends on the competent statutory forum and the subject-matter of the reference; the Faridabad court was held to have jurisdiction because the parties had chosen Faridabad as the seat and forum, and the property location and Delhi proceedings did not displace that choice on the facts. An ex parte award made after the stipulated time was not treated as automatically void, because the court could consider extension of time and related reliefs. The ex parte order making the award rule of the court was therefore set aside and the matter remitted for decision on merits. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=165147